Kids Campus Holdings Pty Ltd v Kelly [2007] VSC 282 (7 August 2007)
The Issue
When can a Landlord reasonably withhold consent to a transfer of a Lease where the legal identity of the Tenant is to change?
What happened?
A Tenant was to sell its business to a proprietary limited company and sought the consent of the Landlord to transfer the Lease.
Prior to receiving a response, the Tenant requested the Landlord's consent to a transfer of the Lease to a listed Property Trust instead. This Trust would then sub-let the premises to the purchaser proprietary limited company, which company would carry out the day to day functions of the business. The Landlord was initially silent on the matter and then refused consent 6 months after consent had been sought. Reasons for the refusal were provided only after a further 2 months.
The Supreme Court held that, although the delay in providing reasons for the refusal indicated that the refusal was not genuine or reasonable, there were factors existing at the time of refusal which would have been apparent to the Landlord at the time of the Landlord's refusal of consent.
The factors were as follows
The Court held that the refusal was reasonable, as these factors adversely affected the Landlord's financial risk by limiting the Landlord's debt recovery rights against the Trust's assets.
Practical tip
An agent should be aware that, in the situation where the original purchaser has nominated an alternative purchaser, the original purchaser continues to be bound by the contract and not the alternative or nominee purchaser.
The information contained in this article is intended to be of a general nature only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Any legal matters should be discussed specifically with one of our lawyers.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
Andre 是 Sharrock Pitman Legal 的首席律师,领导我们的房地产法团队,同时是由维多利亚法律协会认证的房地产法专家。他为各类规模和类型的企业主(从零售业务到地产开发商及投资者)提供房地产相关支持,包括完成交易、解决障碍、代理争议,以及提供商业事务咨询。







_th-1339574840.jpg)

